In a new piece of news, medieval-style therapy clearly had its limits. But a pivotal moment in the House of the Dragon premiere will likely resonate for many that goes beyond the realm of imagination and touches on real-world concerns about women’s reproductive rights.
In the opening chapter of the HBO series The Queen, Emma Targaryen is in the midst of a hard labor. Her husband King Viserys is desperate for a son to secure a male heir to the throne according to Targaryen tradition.
Told that the child is a fractured birth, medical advisers say that the king is faced with a dire choice that would require either losing the child or sacrificing the mother’s life to try to save it.
After suffering for a time, the King chooses the latter with blood loss from the horrific process that killed the Queen. In earlier episodes, Emma refers to the women who give birth as our battlefield.
This is especially true of the show’s reality, thanks to the limited resources of the time, as James Hibbard of The Hollywood Reporter noted for the first season doing what Game of Thrones did for weddings.
The series cast as a fictionalized fantasy is impossible to completely divorce from discussion about abortion since the Supreme Court overturned Roe v Wade in June.
Fostering fierce debates about the issues of forced birth and the freedom of women to make their own health care choices that ultimately decide with the most dire consequences for her the fact that the child later dies.
does not erase Viserys’ actions although it eventually leads him to name his daughter Princess Rainera Millie Alcock as his heir, despite breaking with tradition and hoping that a future son will be born to a new queen. will prompt him to take his place.
At its core, as acknowledged by the producers, the first season of House of the Dragon hinges on questions involving a patriarchal society where sons are favored under pressure to secure royal bloodshed and chaos and strife without such There may be clear lines of succession.
Addressing those themes, executive producer Miguel Sapochnik has stated that a fundamental tension within the series is the notion of women’s patriarchy, noting that the pursuit of such material included its decision to anchor the story around female characters. Is.
The show felt more contemporary although the primary mission is presenting an earlier chapter in writer George R.R. Martin’s struggle for the Iron Throne. The creators were clearly mindful of early criticisms of Game of Thrones.
This includes the inclusion of people of color in the cast of House and, as Salon noted, employing a more restrained approach in depicting sexual violence. The scale and setting of House of the Dragon suggests that it occurs on different levels. Trying to appeal to different audiences.
Escapism and its connection to the mythology inherent in Martin’s writings and earlier series are included but the play is a way of touching on matters relating to our lives whether it is set in the past, the future or some alternate version of reality.
So in terms of writing the series as sheer fantasy as the premiere suggests and future episodes will be strong, don’t let the dragons fool you.